On Tuesday, April 28, King Charles III stepped onto the floor of the U.S. Capitol and became only the second member of the British royal family to speak directly to American lawmakers. The 77‑year‑old monarch’s address was a historic moment for the United Kingdom and for the relationship between the two nations, but it also drew attention for its deliberate omission of a highly controversial topic: the late Jeffrey Epstein. The king’s decision to sidestep the scandal that has haunted his brother, Prince Andrew, sparked debate among politicians, media outlets, and the public alike.
A Historic Royal Address
King Charles’s appearance in Washington, D.C., marked a milestone in diplomatic history. While the royal family has visited the United States many times, only Prince William and Prince Harry have previously addressed Congress. Charles’s speech was part of a broader visit that included meetings with President Biden, the First Lady, and other senior officials. The event was widely covered by both British and American media, and it was seen as a sign of the enduring ties between the two countries.
During the address, the king spoke on a range of topics that reflected his long‑standing interests and the priorities of the current global agenda. He emphasized the importance of climate action, the need for continued cooperation on security issues, and the value of cultural exchange. The speech was delivered in a calm, measured tone that underscored the king’s role as a unifying figure for the United Kingdom.
The Epstein Question
One of the most discussed aspects of the address was the absence of any reference to Jeffrey Epstein, the disgraced financier who was convicted of sex trafficking and died by suicide in 2019 while awaiting trial. Epstein’s name had become a point of contention for many lawmakers, especially after the death of Prince Andrew’s former associate, who had been a close friend of the late king’s brother.
Representative Ro Khanna, a member of the House of Representatives, had publicly stated that the king would acknowledge Epstein’s victims during his speech. Khanna’s comments were based on a conversation with the British ambassador, who reportedly suggested that the monarch would address the survivors. However, the king’s remarks focused entirely on other subjects, and he made no mention of Epstein or Prince Andrew’s involvement in the scandal.
Many observers interpreted the omission as a deliberate effort to avoid reigniting a painful chapter in the royal family’s history. Others argued that the king’s silence was a strategic choice to keep the focus on the broader themes of the speech and to prevent the address from becoming a platform for political controversy.
Key Themes of the Speech
While the king avoided the Epstein topic, he covered a wide array of subjects that highlighted his priorities and the challenges facing the world today. The following list summarizes the main points he addressed:
- Climate Change and Environmental Stewardship – The king called for urgent action to combat global warming, citing the United Kingdom’s commitment to the Paris Agreement and the need for international cooperation.
- Security and Counterterrorism – He emphasized the importance of shared intelligence and joint efforts to counter terrorism, especially in the










