The legal landscape for Aaron Phypers, known for his high-profile marriage to actress Denise Richards, has taken a significant turn for the worse. A Los Angeles Superior Court judge recently issued a default judgment against Phypers, ordering him to pay $160,000 to a man who has accused him of fraud. This development marks yet another chapter in a series of legal and personal challenges that have kept Phypers in the headlines throughout 2025 and into 2026.
The Details of the $160,000 Default Judgment
The legal action was initiated by Rupert Perry, who filed a lawsuit against Phypers in November 2024. The core of the complaint centers on allegations of breach of oral contract and fraud by false promise. According to court documents, the case moved forward to a default judgment on March 16 after Phypers failed to file a formal response or appear in court to contest the claims.
In the American legal system, a default judgment is typically granted when a defendant fails to participate in the litigation process. By not responding to the summons or the subsequent filings, Phypers effectively forfeited his opportunity to present a defense against Perry’s claims. Consequently, the court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, mandating the substantial six-figure payout.
Extensive Efforts to Serve Notice
One of the most notable aspects of this case is the lengths to which the plaintiff went to ensure Phypers was aware of the pending litigation. Serving legal documents to public figures can often be a logistical challenge, but Perry took an unconventional route to ensure due process was followed.
Throughout the summer of 2025, Perry placed a series of public notices in the Malibu Times. These advertisements, which ran on June 19, June 26, July 3, and July 10, served as a public notification to Phypers that he was being sued in the Los Angeles Superior Court. The notices explicitly stated that he had a 30-day window to respond to the case filing. Despite these public efforts, Phypers did not engage with the court proceedings, leading to the eventual default judgment.
A Complicated Web of Legal Battles
The timing of this fraud lawsuit coincided with a period of extreme personal turmoil for Phypers. During the summer of 2025, he was deeply entrenched in a contentious and highly publicized divorce battle with Denise Richards. The complexity of his personal life appears to have mirrored his legal troubles, creating a scenario where multiple high-stakes issues were unfolding simultaneously.
The ongoing divorce proceedings between Phypers and Richards have been equally fraught with financial and legal friction. Recent updates from the divorce case indicate that the court ordered Richards to pay Phypers $5,000 per month in support, alongside a $30,000 contribution toward his attorney’s fees. This financial arrangement highlights the adversarial nature of their separation, which continues to play out in the public eye.
Additional Criminal Allegations
Beyond the civil fraud suit and the divorce proceedings, Phypers is currently navigating a much more serious set of legal hurdles. He is facing significant criminal charges that carry heavy potential penalties. These include:
- Two felony counts of injuring a spouse: These charges stem from allegations regarding his conduct within his marriage.
- Two felony counts of dissuading a witness by force or threat: These serious allegations suggest an attempt to interfere with the judicial process or intimidate individuals involved in his legal matters.
These criminal charges represent a major escalation in his legal woes, moving the conversation from civil financial disputes to potential incarceration and a permanent criminal record.
Looking Ahead: The Impact on Phypers’ Future
As of now, representatives for Phypers have remained largely silent regarding the $160,000 judgment, and there has been no immediate comment provided to the press. The combination of a civil fraud judgment, a messy divorce, and pending felony charges creates a precarious situation for the reality star. Whether he will attempt to appeal the default judgment or focus his resources on the criminal defense remains to be seen.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is a default judgment?
A default judgment is a binding court order in favor of one party based on the failure of the other party to take action—such as filing a response or appearing in court—within the legally required timeframe.
Why did the plaintiff use newspaper ads to notify Phypers?
When a defendant cannot be located or is avoiding service of process, courts may allow a plaintiff to use “service by publication.” This involves placing legal notices in a newspaper of record in the area where the defendant is believed to reside, satisfying the legal requirement to notify them of the lawsuit.
What are the potential consequences of the felony charges?
The felony counts of injuring a spouse and dissuading a witness are serious offenses that, if proven in court, could lead to significant prison time, heavy fines, and long-term legal consequences that extend well beyond the current civil disputes.
Is the divorce between Denise Richards and Aaron Phypers finalized?
The divorce remains an ongoing and contentious process. While there have been court-ordered payments, the legal battle over assets and other terms continues to evolve in the Los Angeles court system.
InfluencerBlogger
