In a surprising turn of events, former Jackson family member Jermaine Jackson could be ordered to pay a staggering $6.5\u202fmillion in damages without ever appearing in court. The claim, brought forward by Rita Butler Barrett, alleges that the singer assaulted her in the spring of 1988. The case has unfolded largely outside the courtroom, with the plaintiff\u2019s legal team resorting to service by publication after failing to locate the defendant. If the judge approves the default judgment, Jackson would lose the lawsuit without having the opportunity to present a defense.<\/p>\n
Rita Butler Barrett first filed her complaint in December\u202f2023 under California\u2019s Sexual Abuse and Cover\u2011Up Accountability Act (SACAA). According to the lawsuit, Barrett was introduced to Jermaine Jackson through industry contacts and the Musicians\u2019 Union. One day in 1988, Jackson allegedly arrived at Barrett\u2019s home in Encino, California, forced his way inside, and \u201cviolently raped\u201d her. Barrett claims she feared for her life during the assault and believed she was in imminent danger of serious bodily harm or death. The alleged incident left her traumatized, and she has since sought justice for the alleged violation of her rights.<\/p>\n
Barrett\u2019s attorneys have struggled to locate Jermaine Jackson, who has not responded to the lawsuit. Traditional methods of service\u2014such as personal delivery or mail\u2014were deemed ineffective, prompting the legal team to request court approval for service by publication. In 2025, a Los Angeles judge granted the request, allowing the defendants to be served through notices published in the Los Angeles Times for four consecutive weeks in August and September. When the court later approved a second round of publication in February\u202f2026, the notices were again placed in the newspaper to inform Jackson of the lawsuit and the damages being sought.<\/p>\n
Service by publication is a legal mechanism used when a defendant\u2019s whereabouts are unknown or when they have deliberately evaded notice. While it is less direct than personal service, it is recognized by courts as a legitimate way to ensure that a defendant is made aware of legal proceedings. However, it also underscores the difficulty Barrett\u2019s team has faced in reaching Jackson, raising questions about the defendant\u2019s willingness or ability to engage with the legal process.<\/p>\n
If the judge signs off on the default judgment, Jermaine Jackson would be required to pay:<\/p>\n
Because a default judgment is entered when a defendant fails to respond or appear, Jackson would not have the opportunity to contest the allegations or present evidence to mitigate the damages. The case would be resolved solely on the plaintiff\u2019s claims and the court\u2019s discretion.<\/p>\n
Barrett\u2019s lawsuit paints a vivid picture of the alleged assault and the psychological toll it has taken on her. She describes the incident as a \u201cviolent rape\u201d that left her fearing for her life. The lawsuit also highlights the broader context of sexual abuse within the entertainment industry, suggesting that Barrett\u2019s allegations are part of a larger pattern of misconduct that has historically been covered up or ignored.<\/p>\n
Barrett\u2019s legal team has emphasized the importance of holding powerful individuals accountable, especially when they have the resources to avoid traditional legal processes. By pursuing a default judgment, Barrett seeks to ensure that her voice is heard and that justice is served, even if the defendant chooses not to engage directly with the court.<\/p>\n
The Los Angeles court\u2019s approval of service by publication in 2025 and again in 2026 indicates that the court is willing to consider unconventional methods of service when a defendant is unresponsive. The next critical step is the judge\u2019s decision on whether to grant the default judgment. If the judge approves, the case will close with Jackson ordered to pay the damages and legal costs. If the judge<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"In a surprising turn of events, former Jackson family member Jermaine Jackson could be ordered to pay a staggering $6.5 million in damages without ever appearing in court. The claim, brought forward by Rita Butler Barrett, alleges that the singer assaulted her in the spring of 1988. The case has…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":3510,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-10793","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/influencerswiki.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10793","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/influencerswiki.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/influencerswiki.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/influencerswiki.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/influencerswiki.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10793"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/influencerswiki.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10793\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/influencerswiki.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/3510"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/influencerswiki.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10793"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/influencerswiki.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10793"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/influencerswiki.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10793"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}